Ask HN: Are YouTube ads getting worse?
I opened a ~1 hour video and saw notches in the timeline for 10 different ad breaks. This is as bad as live TV now. Ads play at the end of videos. More videos have long, unskippable ads. More ad breaks in the middle of videos.
Multiple people in my circles said they noticed this too when asked, but it could just be a fluke/some kind of group confirmation bias. Has anyone else experienced this? Or even better, collected data on it?
Yes, Youtube ads are getting more aggressive. Instead of just 1 ad per interruption (either pre-roll or mid-roll), it's multiple ads in succession. Instead of a few interruptions, it has increased to many interruptions. Unlike you, I don't get the yellow bars in the timeline that show where the ad spots are anymore.
Many Youtubers have made videos about the aggressive ad changes. Here's one example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_tkS4dvi8A
I don't know if any new definitive statistics are out but some Youtubers complain that they don't seem to be getting any additional money even though viewers are bombarded with more ads.
This is a large part of why I won't pay for the premium service. I don't know how much creators get, but I know they always work their way toward pitiful payouts like Spotify. For an example of this slide, see how microstock has gone from something you could make a living on to ever-shrinking payouts and increasingly opaque bonus structures.
A recent example is Shutterstock's change to the payout and bonus structure.
https://www.reddit.com/r/photography/comments/guv6s3/shutter...
https://xpiksapp.com/blog/2020/new-shutterstock-earnings-bre...
The minimum was 25 cents per image. That could add up fast when an agency buyer with a huge bulk credit plan took notice of your portfolio and bought it out, then returned every time you added more. It's now 10 cents per image.
Spotify got there fast. YouTube will get there if it isn't already.
If there’s one ad I get the most, it’s the God damned YouTube premium ads. I don’t know how many times I have to say no to the prompts. I wish there were a way to say “I will delete the app before I buy this”.
I’m constantly getting “trump approval” campaign ads. Oh the joy of living in Florida.
The large part of why I would never pay for premium service is that most of the YouTube content consists of unauthorized reproductions of works.
I'm not sure why you're attributing this to some bad will from the platform instead of just basic supply and demand economics?
Spotify directly removed massive barriers to entry in distributing music. So there are more artists available to you than ever. Listeners might have grown as well, but it seems not in the same scale.
This could also be the case in microstock (and it seems to make logical sense). More and more photos are posted, and more people are posting. So ofcourse as supply grows the price lowers.
>> "I'm not sure why you're attributing this to some bad will from the platform instead of just basic supply and demand economics?"
I made no attribution to bad will. I described a phenomenon without judgment.
This is exactly the reason why I made Layluh[0].
It gets rid of all of the ads on a video and removes most of the UI, so all you're left with is an iframe. Here's your video in Layluh[1].
[0]: https://www.layluh.com/features [1]: https://www.layluh.com/watch?v=F_tkS4dvi8A
This is great. Does it violate Youtube's terms in any way?
This is pretty cool! Feature Request: An option to change the quality of the video.
omg yes, I was noticing this over the past week specifically. I keep getting these crap ads multiple times in pretty short video (less than 20 min?)
Reminds me of watching TV when I was a kid :(
For $12 a month (40 cents a day) you can use YouTube ad free. Personally, I don't notice the missing $12 but I do notice the missing ads, so it's worth it to me.
If you don't want ads, this seems like a more than fair offer from YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/premium
I used Firefox with ublock origin[0] and never see an ad.
[0]https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock
I pay for YouTube Premium largely because the family watches YouTube on Roku, AppleTV, etc. For that, it’s worth it.
I wish YouTube music wouldn’t share subscriptions with YouTube proper, but I just pay for Spotify and ignore YouTube Music.
I use the same on desktop, but for an ad free mobile experience, and background audio play on an unjailbroken iPhone, coughing up the cash seems most appropriate.
The uBlock plugin also works on the Firefox Android app!
or, for adfree youtube experience on android, I am using "youtube vanced" [0](like advanced, but without the ad), and heard lots of people vouching for opensource "newpipe"[1]
Edit: Be warned: just found out that theres a "Block All Ads For Youtube Vanced ads" in playstore thats a fake scam (it even contains ads on its own). Real Vanced isn't on playstore
[0]: https://vanced.app/
non root: https://www.xda-developers.com/youtube-vanced-apk/
root: https://www.xda-developers.com/youtube-vanced-apk-root/
[1]: https://newpipe.schabi.org/
Thief!!!!
"Your contract with the network when you get the show is you're going to watch the spots. Otherwise you couldn't get the show on an ad-supported basis. Any time you skip a commercial or watch the button you're actually stealing programming." --Jamie Kellner, former Warner executive
I'm okay with this. They've deplatformed or suppressed most of my favorite YouTubers anyway, and they are trying to push a culture that I don't agree with.
Then stop using YouTube. If I don't agree with the grocery store's business choices, I can steal from them?
They're a monopoly and the leader of a winner-take-all market. They leverage their power to control the narrative on many topics. I think of any company to not support, YouTube is a good one to do so.
You wouldn’t download a car!
> They've deplatformed or suppressed most of my favorite YouTubers anyway
> They're a monopoly and the leader of a winner-take-all market.
There is some cognitive dissonance in there, particularly with "deplatforming" and "monopoly" part. If your favorite creators are all gone, why don't you just stop using that service? (I have done exactly that, tbh).
There's no dissonance. A monopoly has the capacity to remove anyone from their platform with no real reprocussions, so that's what they do.
why don't you just stop using that service?
There are no real alternatives to YouTube that any real content creators are willing to move to, and there are still some users that I watch, so I download the videos and don't support the platform. I have my cake and eat it too, so to speak.
Not supporting is not the same as stealing. It's your business as to whether you want to support YT or not, but your disagreeing with their business practices or business model does not give you the right to steal. Perhaps I've misunderstood you (I'm reading this in context of your previous comment where you said you were okay with this, which I take to mean you're okay with stealing their content)?
We have different ethical standards then. If a company is a monopoly that actively leverages its power to manipulate entire populations, then I am fine with exploiting services which it makes available. They have the ability to keep me from accessing the site if I use an ad blocker. If they want me off the platform that much, they can boot me off.
True but this is a better argument for leaving. They will retain you without ad income largely because that is valuable to them compared to people leaving their platform and what a group of actual non-spectators might entail afa the marketplace.
I see what you're saying, but that's a prisoner's dilemma[1]. By that I mean it would require the coordination of millions of others who are also sick of the platform to behave irrationally. It also assumes that people who leech off of YouTube would be unwilling to try a different site because of their leeching.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner%27s_dilemma
This, I think, is your argument. It's helped me to see where you're coming from and - I don't disagree. This is a good point. Thanks for helping me see things differently!
Sounds like a Nash equilibrium.
That’s not how the web works. The host (YouTube) serves the content, my user agent (Firefox and add-ons) renders it. Stop trying to turn the internet into cable TV.
YouTube can create its own client software (like it does for iOS/Android) and do what it wants. As long as it openly serves content via HTTP then I can render the content it sends anyway I want on my computer.
Works great on Desktop, but more complicated on iOS without a piHole.
I use iOS Safari with content blockers and never see YouTube ads.
However, if YouTube were to start annoying me I would just stop going there. Just like when I stopped watching TV due to the frequency of ads on American television.
Fortunately for me, I don't watch a lot of YouTube. More often I'm on Twitch, where I also don't see ads on my desktop at least. Unfortunately Twitch has started downgrading their mobile experience trying to force all mobile users to use the Twitch app instead. It's not big loss, I don't really watch Twitch on my phone. On my tablet, I just RDP into my Windows desktop and watch through there.
I would miss Twitch if I had to leave it, but I'm so anti-advertising that if they forced ads on me I wouldn't think twice about leaving.
Which content blocker(s) do you currently use on iOS Safari?
BlockBear
Here's the browser add-on links for the curious:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin...
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublock-origin/cjpa...
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/ublock-origin/9nblggh444l4...
Make sure to go into the Options > Filter Lists and check the Annoyances section. That'll get you through most soft-paywalls these days (WaPo, The Atlantic, etc).
Also, the Japanese Language section will trip a LOT for some reason, so you may want to skip that.
and it comes with a streaming music service that I personally believe is better than Spotify
Yeah, I don't technically pay for "YouTube Premium" but since it comes for "free" with my Google Play Music sub....well, cool.
On desktop I'd never notice (I haven't run without an adblocker for probably ten years), but on mobile it's a sanity saver.
It's unfortunate they're phasing out of google play music and putting everyone on the Youtube Music app. I had to transfer all my music to it the other day. I still pay $9.99 for everything though and get to watch youtube ad free so I don't really mind but it's a bit of a bummer.
On a side note, I switched from Play to Spotify in the last month because they kept trying to push me towards YT Music. The mobile app for YT Music is pretty trash, and the less Google I have in my life the better. Not to mention I was still getting ads on YT even though I had premium, I think the no-ads deal is for music videos only, not other YT videos.
Have you noticed any change in audio quality between the two, GPM and Spotify? I've tried to poke at all the settings, and googled to learn more, but the Spotify recordings sound different. I'm trying to decide which i like better.
I haven't noticed a difference, but Spotify has like 5 different levels of quality for streaming in the settings. Were you using the equalizer in Play Music?
> I think the no-ads deal is for music videos only, not other YT videos.
Not in my experience - and I use the mobile app daily (my lunchbreaks generally consist of catching up on the few folks I subscribe to).
I also haven't noticed any sort of push towards YT Music...But then again, I don't really "browse" Play Music either; I just press play on one of my previously found artists (using the Start Radio button) or search if I'm looking for someone I've not listened to before.
That requires me to be logged in, which is a no-go for me because they still use it to track me and come up with suggestions based on what I have viewed, which means I get an abominable amount of crap that is suggested and which I am no longer interested in (I watched 3 videos about the subject already, thank you very much) and even less privacy.
FWIW I turned off suggestions and I don't get recommendations anymore. Doesn't solve the tracking problem though.
I just wish they offered a bundle with YouTube TV. I'd add this in a heartbeat to my YouTube TV service if it were $5-$6 per month extra as part of a bundle.
Also it depends on the country too I guess. Like in India the same is available for 99 rs / month (129 rs if you wish to get yt music).
Not sure how long this will last but it's been the same since launch, so it's really a no brainer not to upgrade.
Yes, it is from the recent changes in YouTube's manage ad breaks policy. Starting July, they will be doing mid-roll ads for videos longer than 8 minutes [1].
[1] https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6175006?hl=en
I've also notice a huge push for youtube premium on mobile. It used to be a once a week thing. Now almost every time I open the app I'm greeted by the popup asking me to upgrade.
I find this behaviour by Google really fucking annoying. Just leave me alone after I have said no 15 times in the last week.
Would you prefer that they just put up a modal banner saying 'subscription required'?
I would.
Yes 100%. At least that doesnt require a tap
Most other companies would have deniability about doing it on purpose, but google probably keeps track of this stuff and runs A/B testing with it etc..
The constant unskippable ads in the Youtube app meant I jettisoned the app on my mobile devices and just watch Youtube via the browser (even though they make it a terrible experience) because my ad blocker works in the browser.
I used to do that, but my phone now has youtube vanced - it can even play stuff in the background.
if you're using android, check out redtube.
I use Firefox to browse and with long click and open in app to let redtube handle it. it also is nice to have the option of watching the vid as popup and keep browsing around on YouTube
Dangerous search right there.
If I understand correctly from a friend, the problem is YouTubers (and YouTube/Google) are currently making _much less_ money per ad. It sounds like more are getting shoved per video to make up for it (iirc, it's up to YouTube to determine this?).
Most of the content creators I follow also upload to BitChute (or have been booted from YouTube), so I've moved all my playlists there. I also donate $5/month to BitChute.
Grabbing videos off YouTube with youtube-dl for local viewing is another way to skip ads. Given their censorious policies, I have zero interest in paying YouTube to go ad-free.
The one that grinds my gears is the apparent time between ads. I’m learning how to play the banjo and I watch tutorials. This means play, pause, go back to time X and play again. Every few iterations, I get interrupted with an ad or two. Arrrrrgggh!
Install UBlock Origin.
Youtube on my Apple TV is going bananas for ads. They're everywhere! I don't know how this feels for US users where you guys have a lot more ads in TV in general. But it's starting to feel pretty hostile with my UK sensibilities.
Youtube has ads? I never see them since I never use the Youtube site directly, only through an intermediate like youtube-dl or streamlink and programs which integrate this type of functionality, NewPipe on Android, etc. Once they start splicing ads directly into the video stream on the server I might start to get ads but by that time there will either be a way to rip them out again or I'll just keep from using Youtube - something which is getting easier with time by them de-platforming anyone who doesn't abide by the vague and ever-shifting set of rules the censors use to keep the platform palatable to those same advertisers who are making things worse as well as the screeching cancel mobs which are popping up left and right on the 'net. Eventually they might manage to cancel each other out upon which there will be a day of celebration.
Peace will return (with or without a platform named Youtube), until such a time I will flaunt the DMCA at hearts content to keep myself and those around me sane. Call me a thief, call me a pirate, call me anything you want but after decades of ever more abusive ad tech the time is long past to make a stance: the only good ad is a skipped ad. Don't like it? I understand, but the solution does not lie with me. It lies with the shysters in the ad tech industry. Line 'm up against the wall, shame them for life and never let them near a computer again and we'll talk, until such time I say Sayonara.
uBlock Origin has worked perfectly for me on the desktop, I haven't seen an ad since forever.
I honestly don't understand, why anybody would even use a web browser without proper Adblock technology.
The frequency of ads got bad enough that some months ago I changed over to an android YouTube client that doesn't show ads. I wouldn't watch YouTube otherwise.
I saw two ads right in the middle of a 5 min kids video.
It is getting pretty bad. I did not mind the mandatory ad right in the beginning.
For me its also the quality of the ads which is a problem. Over and over I get Grammerly adverts even though I always flag them as repetitive, inappropriate or irrelevant (always signed in). They have nothing to do with my interests or viewing habits.
Twitch does an outstanding job by comparison.
I hate, Hate, HATE grammerly ads.
I'm getting ads to porn (non-video, I have that blocked). I don't have an account and frequently flush cookies. I just didn't think I'd see the day, especially because they have no way of knowing if I'm older than 18.
Open source front-end for YouTube https://invidio.us It has no ads, no trackers , no Google account required
Recently ads have been getting through my adblockers or videos fail to load if the ad is blocked. Refreshing the page or adding a '.' to the url seems to fix this.
If anybody wonders at which position: 'youtube.com.' instead of 'youtube.com', background discussed in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23479435
pretty sure they patched this a week or 2 ago.
I'm not sure which is more surprising. That there are more ads or that anyone is surprised by this. It is owned by google.
YouTube vanced on Android and Ublock origin on desktop. Problem solved. In my POV, the ads got worse a long time ago.
Yes. Watching youtube on a smart TV on the installed Youtube app is a nightmare. Time for a Raspberry Pi for media.
if you are going for a raspberry I would suggest using it for pihole instead. That would solve the ad issue for all your devices
Does pi-hole remove Youtube ads? pi-hole can only block whole ad domains. I would be surprised if Youtube deliberately served ad videos from a different domain than regular videos.
It does not. YouTube, at least on my smart TV, serves ads from a domain that is indistinguishable from the domain that serves the video content.
Pihole won't solve it, unfortunately. The only way to block it is to have a Chrome/FF on the media device plus adblocker. But that's very complicated topic and when I checked there were no suitable distributions and ways to get it. I ended up getting a proper PC and using it as a media server instead of pi-like devices.
Also, the advertisers are savvy to how long they have before you're allowed to hit that skip, and so pitching in the first 5 seconds is getting more common, leading to some pretty absurd copy/delivery. I just love that guy who grabs me on the street shouting in my face about free energy.
Also product placement in the video is pretty common.
I'm starting to look at Twich, vimeo more, any other alternatives?
lbry.tv
Yes. I have been getting ads on my Apple TV at a much higher rate over the past few weeks, which is putting me off a fair bit. Enough to consider auto-downloading certain channels and shoving them into Plex.
I recently got a survey on youtube. On TV. I won't file a survey on TV!
I think Google is preparing the axe, or at least something equally drastic.
If I watch while not-signed in, I get an ad every couple minutes. Unwatchable.
If I'm signed into my Google account, I usually just get an ad at the start of a video, and they are usually skippable, so no big deal.
That should be a strong signal about how much data about you is worth to Google.
On Android, if you install f-droid, you can install newpipe and avoid all ads.
On Linux, ublock origin plus Firefox removes basically all ads. You can also use youtube-dl in the terminal, though that can be difficult.
Ublock origin also works in Firefox for Android.
If you install mpv you can stream the video straight to a player and so skip the entire download and all the ads.
No idea. Since I'm using FireFox, Blokada (AdGuard DNS) on Android, and FireFox, uBlock Origin, uMatrix, NoScript on PC, my mental RAM does not get strained by ads and other nonsense.
I was happily blocking them with NextDNS and 1Blocker until about a week ago when suddenly they started getting past both blockers, multiple ads on every video.
> Are YouTube ads getting worse?
Yes.
Longer, more consistent, and so wildly off the mark at times I feel like I should be offended.
Does anybody else only get scam ads?
I get some weird ads of some Doomsday-esque vegan cult sometimes. It's super weird.
I don't see YouTube ads because of uBlock Origin, but from what I can tell from other people's computers not having any form of adblock, I've seen that Adsense serves scam ads all the time, so it wouldn't surprise me if YouTube ads were the same. (It's astounding how these corporations can hold the mantle of "fact checking" but are happy to serve potentially dangerous bullshit when it helps their bottom line)
I use ublock too. I only see ads on mobile. I have started screenshotting all of the scams I see. Maybe I will send them all to the FTC at some point.
Not scams, I've been mostly getting ads related to my recent google searches.
Yes, they seem to be targeting people affected by COVID, promising easy get-rich quick schemes online...
I have gotten some scam ads recently, although I do not get them exclusively.
One was a 'Jeff Bezos bitcoin giveaway. Send up to 2 BTC to this address and Jeff will match you and send it back.'
I wonder if the address has any tx.
search 'jeff bezos/elon musk bitcoin giveaway scam' and youll see alot of people have taken the bait unfortunately
The few times I have seen ads they have been for local grocery stores, grammarly and such. Not really what I would call scammy.
I get a lot of "get rich quick selling stuff on Amazon" ads, that all seem to start with some guy pulling fistfuls of notes out of a cardboard box. Otherwise, Google seems to think I really like iced tea, Spotify, and Facebook.
about 1 in 10 is a get rich quick scheme, and with no way to downvote it, meanwhile the ones for college courses which is slightly relevant to me can be downvoted. It makes no sense.
I get lots of scam ads on youtube. I noticed they started this year.
Also some porn-ish ads. Got one while trying to show a lego-related video to my kid on my phone...
Seeing the scam and porn-ish ads is almost good because in the entirety of 2019 all I saw was ads for insurance. There were days where every video had the same Liberty ad...
Seriously, I wish the content creators I follow would start submitting content to another platform.
I use Brave and haven't seen a YouTube ad in a long time.
Install uBlock Origin and you will never see an ad again
Yes, I use Brave which has always blocked the ads, but they've been coming through since ~1-2 weeks ago.
Was the same for me. I updated Brave yesterday which fixed it.
YouTube recently made changes to how they display their ads that affected a fair amount of filter lists.
https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/7519
1) Try not to use youtube 2) if u really need to watch smth that's on yt use browser with adblock or newpipe app
ITT: people complaining about a free service. Why not just pay for YouTube Red?
Oh, where do I start:
- I don't want music and there is no discount for that - I don't like random benign channel removals/strikes - I don't like censorship - I don't like copyright situation - There is not option to pay for family for whole year - They are getting closer and closer to killing rss support.
My setup right now is that I receive youtube updates into my newsboat. I run a macro if I want to watch a video and it goes into download queue and is downloaded by youtube-dl. It synthing-ed onto every single of my devices (including Emby) and then I watch it whenever I feel like, offline, no adds, no nothing, through a normal video player.
YT has a lot less censorship than most cable TV packages, all things considered. And "I never watch video category X, so I'd rather not pay for it" is neither here nor there, unless you'd rather have to pay a la carte for every single YT category you may want to watch in the future. Having a single payment for the service as a whole is just better.
It’s not really free though is it? It just doesn’t cost money.
Yes, I meant free as in free beer of course. I thought that was fairly obvious.
(If you care about genuinely Free alternatives, they're out there but most people would have to self-host them.)
That’a just a very strange comment to make. Why is it commentworthy that people would criticize a product that they do make an exchange to use and that has gotten markedly worse over time?