The concept of insider risk is that we don't trust the employees, because you can't trust everyone, due to a combination of apathy and potentially malicious activity. Blocking non approved generative AI systems, as well as governing and monitoring the use of approved systems, isn't just good security best practices; it can also be required as part of compliance (depending on your regulatory obligations, if any).
The concept of insider risk is that we don't trust the employees, because you can't trust everyone, due to a combination of apathy and potentially malicious activity. Blocking non approved generative AI systems, as well as governing and monitoring the use of approved systems, isn't just good security best practices; it can also be required as part of compliance (depending on your regulatory obligations, if any).
https://www.cisa.gov/topics/physical-security/insider-threat...
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/Insider%20T...
Additional context:
83% of orgs reported at least one insider attack in the last year [1], and insiders are responsible for ~18% of security incidents [2].
[1] https://go1.gurucul.com/2024-insider-threat-report
[2] https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/
[dead]