points by paulvnickerson 6 months ago Maybe if Wikipedia sourced more peer reviewed publications and less Vox, I would be more satisfied. Thrilled to see Grokipedia as a competitor that could perhaps pressure Wikipedia to improve its editorial policies.
antoniojtorres 6 months ago I can’t, in good conscience, think that Musk would objectively be a good steward of an encyclopedia.
whoknowsidont 6 months ago If this isn't ragebait I don't know what is. unethical_ban 6 months ago Poe's Law in effect.
advisedwang 6 months ago Did they omit Wikipedia when creating the models behind Grokipedia? Otherwise it less a competitor and more a re-hash. tapete2 6 months ago Well, some of the "articles" on Grokipedia even state that they were sourced from Wikipedia.
tapete2 6 months ago Well, some of the "articles" on Grokipedia even state that they were sourced from Wikipedia.
I can’t, in good conscience, think that Musk would objectively be a good steward of an encyclopedia.
If this isn't ragebait I don't know what is.
Poe's Law in effect.
Did they omit Wikipedia when creating the models behind Grokipedia? Otherwise it less a competitor and more a re-hash.
Well, some of the "articles" on Grokipedia even state that they were sourced from Wikipedia.