lschueller 11 hours ago

There is absolutely no reason for this cars to be available in Europe. The demand is so extremly low, that you couldn't even call it a niche in a niche. If there would be a market and demand, car importers would already have created a foothold for this cars in Europe. It's like arguing, no one buys surfboards in central sahara because of hostile regulations.

Mobius01 14 hours ago

I will take a wild risk here and say that… it’s probably by design.

  • dlcarrier 13 hours ago

    Yeah, it's pretty normal with automotive regulation to promote whatever domestic manufacturers make over imports. In the US, EPA regulations so heavily favored domestic trucks that that PT Cruiser was somewhat famously classified as a truck.

    • hkpack 12 hours ago

      It is not only about domestic manufacturing.

      The trend is that roads are becoming more dangerous in the US, with the cars being bigger as a major contributor.

      People in US are fine with increasing casualties for some reason, and I’m glad that in EU the general consensus is to continue with keeping roads safer.

  • m463 7 hours ago

    Might be road design. I think european roads are generally narrower than US roads which have 12' wide lanes. I remember the F-150 raptor was > 7' wide (without mirrors).

mrlonglong 12 hours ago

Our UK roads are not designed for oversized pickups.

Glawen 12 hours ago

7000 sales per year, come on. They are too big and unpractical for Europe.

andrepd 14 hours ago

It's disgusting that they were ever allowed in the first place. Cars have extremely high externalities, the bare minimum is that people pay for them.

An EU directive implementing vehicle tax proportional to weight is urgent. Heavier cars pollute more, damage the road more, are much more dangerous for pedestrians and bicycles.

  • downrightmike 13 hours ago

    US: Makes personal city trucks larger to skirt US regulations

    EU: Bans those trucks because they were created skirting regulations to the extreme

    • linksnapzz 7 hours ago

      The trucks are fully conformant w/ EPA & FMVSS regs.

      That you don't like how those have been implemented isn't the fault of a manufacturer.

      • digitalPhonix 7 hours ago

        The loophole is to classify them as “light” commercial vehicles.

        I’m fine with that if US regulation was consistent with that commercial classification and they required a CDL to drive (and all the associated annual medical checks and zero BAC etc.)

        If that consistency was there every manufacturer would immediately drop the commercial classification and figure out how to make their trucks satisfy the passenger classification in FMVSS.

  • cbeach 10 hours ago

    If we cared about reducing road casualties, then objectively speaking, we should ban bikes. Roads are designed for cars (people in protective metal boxes with hundreds of sophisticated safety features).

    Roads were never intended for people on flimsy two wheeled contraptions with nothing more than a polystyrene cap to protect them.

ErroneousBosh 13 hours ago

And nothing of value was lost.

What's the point of these things? They're not useful for anything. They're horrible to drive, get through fuel like a burning oil well, can't tow, and can't carry anything.

If you need something to haul building materials around, get a van.

  • soupbowl 13 hours ago

    Can't tow and can't carry anything, "get a van". Yeah, vans are known for their amazing tow capacity.

    • ErroneousBosh 13 hours ago

      It's what all the builders round here use. Full-size Ford Transit and if they need to carry more than about three tonnes, a trailer on the back.

      • ebbi 12 hours ago

        One of the downsides to using a van for these heavy duty use cases (speaking from experience) is that they're typically not equipped with powerful enough engines. So you end up straining the engine when towing heavy loads, which reduces the life of it considerably.

        Also for a lot of vehicles, a GVM/GCM upgrade is needed to be able to tow certain loads.

        Not defending these large american trucks. I think there are valid use cases for them (in smaller bodies), but the majority of the ones I see driving around are just for peoples pleasure and not utility.

        • linksnapzz 7 hours ago

          Not only the engine, but also the transmissions and suspensions on commercial vans in the US aren't rated for duty past a certain gross weight.

        • ErroneousBosh 2 hours ago

          Well, not really. The biggest size Transits have a 2.4 or 3.2 litre diesel which will pull hell up a high wall.

          Compare that to these pickups which have neither the power nor the grip to get out of their own way.

  • nosrepa 9 hours ago

    I am a landscaper and would absolutely not be able to do my job without a large truck. I agree that for most cases a truck is not needed, but some jobs simply require their use.

    • digitalPhonix 8 hours ago

      I see plenty of landscapers in Ireland with utility vans. What’s wrong with those?

      (I’m not a landscaper, but they seem to pack in everything from hand tools to those petrol powered tiller & compacting tools)

  • linksnapzz 7 hours ago

    Ever try to hose out the back of a van after you've carried a 1/2 ton of manure in it? Or, say, a carcass or two from a feedlot?

    In the US, a sizeable % of pickups are equipped w/ dump &&|| stake beds for precisely this type of work.