Show HN: Geomatic – A command-driven geometry studio enabled with autodiff

www.tinyvolt.com

70 points by nivter 1 day ago

All commands have the format `output = \func inputs` or just `\function inputs`. Points and scalars are built on the fly. Eg `\line a b` to an empty canvas creates points `a` and `b`, and joins them with a line.

One can use broadcasting semantics similar to NumPy and PyTorch in a visual setting (imagine creating a list of circles where one dim corresponds to radius and another to the center). One can also use backpropagation, run gradient descent or visualize vector fields. Almost everything is reactive so changing a variable updates all of the downstream geometry. It also allows anyone to write and load their own visualization, which can be broadcasted and differentiated through.

https://www.tinyvolt.com/geomatic/examples/getting-started

hbwang2076 1 day ago

Clean implementation. One thing I always look for: how does this degrade when things go wrong? Good error handling is what separates weekend projects from tools people actually use.

  • james_marks 1 day ago

    As an adult, I now write clean error handling first thing.

    The person it benefits the most is the author, when they are building it and the errors-per-use are as high as they’ll (hopefully) ever be.

herpdyderp 1 day ago

- When I have an example open, I can't type any commands.

- When I open an example, I expected to actually... see an example. I'm not gonna read the wall of text. I don't even understand what this is yet, that's why I tried to see an example.

  • necovek 11 hours ago

    The example was great for someone like me: I'd rather read through and follow excellent instructions by clicking through commands to understand the value of this command-driven tool.

    If you want to look through a video or something, then this tool is likely not for you! (nothing bad with that, that's why it's great that there are so many different tools we can choose from)

dmos62 1 day ago

Pretty cool. Curious, why a one time payment? Why not, say, a smaller monthly payment?

  • sowow 1 day ago

    Not OP, but for me personally I’m tired of subscriptions. I’m grabbing the one time payment before OP changes his mind.

  • nivter 1 day ago

    Not a fan of subscription hell myself, I plan to use one-time payment for all my products. Implementation wise one time payment is much simpler than setting up smaller payments that cap at a fixed amount.

roger_ 1 day ago

Cool idea but not very mobile friendly it seems.

ddxv 1 day ago

What is autodiff?