kevin_thibedeau 21 hours ago

Swift is 10x past its mission lifetime. This is essentially an open demonstration of antisat tech.

  • ButlerianJihad 20 hours ago

    It’s no secret that the world needs antisat technologies, and we’re openly and directly demonstrating it already, but this mission is really different. For example, it’s highly cooperative, because the whole SWIFT team is on the line to maneuver and position their craft for optimal capture.

    I think the most awesome aspect of this mission is the air-launch capability from an ordinary airplane in flight. And they did it without livestream from the Ronald Reagan Missile Test Range. This is truly S.D.I. tech in my lifetime. So many people mocked the President for promoting it…

  • throwaway27448 19 hours ago

    Antisat like LEO cleanup? Surely there are easier ways to destroy a satellite than launching a new one with arms.

    • dylan604 19 hours ago

      Doing it cleanly vs creating a debris field in orbit isn't a hard thing to understand why it would be desirable.

  • superxpro12 18 hours ago

    What was mercury and gemini other than a demonstration of ICBM tech?

pavel_lishin 19 hours ago

> When it was first launched it sat in an orbit at 373 miles (600 km) and has now lowered to around 220 miles (360 km), with most of that descent in the past two years.

Hot damn, that's a lot of altitude lost.

Ancalagon 17 hours ago

Dumb question: do most NASA satellites in orbit not have some sort of center of mass hook just in case for operations like these?

__patchbit__ 19 hours ago

Hubble needs a lift and SpaceX have been ready to go on that side quest.