grim_io 1 day ago I swear, Thanos-snapping half of any LLM readme will always be an improvement. arsalanshahid 1 day ago The microsite might help, mate: https://chap.brightbeam.works arsalanshahid 1 day ago Also agreed on the GitHub RREADME, we should have most of the details in ABOUT, which we did now. thanks.
arsalanshahid 1 day ago The microsite might help, mate: https://chap.brightbeam.works arsalanshahid 1 day ago Also agreed on the GitHub RREADME, we should have most of the details in ABOUT, which we did now. thanks.
arsalanshahid 1 day ago Also agreed on the GitHub RREADME, we should have most of the details in ABOUT, which we did now. thanks.
m4ck_ 1 day ago CHAP's already taken though. Avicebron 1 day ago Idk man, I had this idea for a Person-to-Prompt Protocol and I think this would help a lot.. aib 1 day ago Did you steal my idea of Human-to-Trasformer Protocol?? ronsor 1 day ago You'll need the Person-to-Prompt Training Protocol to go with it. arsalanshahid 1 day ago Yup, that may be the sequel CHAP would at least capture the human corrections needed to train it. arsalanshahid 1 day ago True, CHAP has been used elsewhere as an acronym ... hard to find a term truly unique these days that also communicates the conceptAnyway, ours focuses specifically on making joint human-agent work traceable and auditable.
Avicebron 1 day ago Idk man, I had this idea for a Person-to-Prompt Protocol and I think this would help a lot.. aib 1 day ago Did you steal my idea of Human-to-Trasformer Protocol?? ronsor 1 day ago You'll need the Person-to-Prompt Training Protocol to go with it. arsalanshahid 1 day ago Yup, that may be the sequel CHAP would at least capture the human corrections needed to train it.
ronsor 1 day ago You'll need the Person-to-Prompt Training Protocol to go with it. arsalanshahid 1 day ago Yup, that may be the sequel CHAP would at least capture the human corrections needed to train it.
arsalanshahid 1 day ago Yup, that may be the sequel CHAP would at least capture the human corrections needed to train it.
arsalanshahid 1 day ago True, CHAP has been used elsewhere as an acronym ... hard to find a term truly unique these days that also communicates the conceptAnyway, ours focuses specifically on making joint human-agent work traceable and auditable.
seahorseemoji 1 day ago People in the comments are rough! I think this looks cool, nice job! arsalanshahid 1 day ago Thank you, I appreciate that!
OutOfHere 1 day ago I am happy saving my refined ticket prompts in a spec folder, so I don't quite understand why I need this project.
I swear, Thanos-snapping half of any LLM readme will always be an improvement.
The microsite might help, mate: https://chap.brightbeam.works
Also agreed on the GitHub RREADME, we should have most of the details in ABOUT, which we did now. thanks.
CHAP's already taken though.
Idk man, I had this idea for a Person-to-Prompt Protocol and I think this would help a lot..
Did you steal my idea of Human-to-Trasformer Protocol??
You'll need the Person-to-Prompt Training Protocol to go with it.
Yup, that may be the sequel CHAP would at least capture the human corrections needed to train it.
True, CHAP has been used elsewhere as an acronym ... hard to find a term truly unique these days that also communicates the concept
Anyway, ours focuses specifically on making joint human-agent work traceable and auditable.
People in the comments are rough! I think this looks cool, nice job!
Thank you, I appreciate that!
I am happy saving my refined ticket prompts in a spec folder, so I don't quite understand why I need this project.