flavius37 2 hours ago HackerTube set off a dozen spin-offs mining Hacker News comments for books, papers and more. The idea dates to 2011; its flaws were spotted by 2013. Gtex555 1 hour ago link this 2011 idea and tell us the flaws flavius37 42 minutes ago Here is the first site of this kind: https://web.archive.org/web/20110305143421/http://www.hacker...There is Section 5 that is mentioning the flaws:- A mention isn't a recommendation.- Counts track popularity, not quality- They inherit HN's taste.- Picks go stale.- The sites don't last- Matching misfires. Unlinked names are ambiguous.
Gtex555 1 hour ago link this 2011 idea and tell us the flaws flavius37 42 minutes ago Here is the first site of this kind: https://web.archive.org/web/20110305143421/http://www.hacker...There is Section 5 that is mentioning the flaws:- A mention isn't a recommendation.- Counts track popularity, not quality- They inherit HN's taste.- Picks go stale.- The sites don't last- Matching misfires. Unlinked names are ambiguous.
flavius37 42 minutes ago Here is the first site of this kind: https://web.archive.org/web/20110305143421/http://www.hacker...There is Section 5 that is mentioning the flaws:- A mention isn't a recommendation.- Counts track popularity, not quality- They inherit HN's taste.- Picks go stale.- The sites don't last- Matching misfires. Unlinked names are ambiguous.
HackerTube set off a dozen spin-offs mining Hacker News comments for books, papers and more. The idea dates to 2011; its flaws were spotted by 2013.
link this 2011 idea and tell us the flaws
Here is the first site of this kind: https://web.archive.org/web/20110305143421/http://www.hacker...
There is Section 5 that is mentioning the flaws:
- A mention isn't a recommendation.
- Counts track popularity, not quality
- They inherit HN's taste.
- Picks go stale.
- The sites don't last
- Matching misfires. Unlinked names are ambiguous.