dang 14 hours ago

Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50429068, which was posted earlier.

  • ndkap 14 hours ago

    I think you have it inverted. The post you linked was posted 4 hours earlier while this post was posted 7 hours earlier.

    • gnabgib 14 hours ago

      You've been tricked by the re-up mechanism. If you mouse-over the times on both articles you'll find the other post is older than this (by 45m). But you can also use the incrementing ID in the URL to figure out which is older.

      • ndkap 14 hours ago

        It says "by <username> 4 hours ago" when I open the url. It also has less points.

        • gnabgib 13 hours ago

          Yes.. mouse over the "4 hours ago" and see the actual time (in UTC): 2026-11-09T18:01:10 .. that's not 4 hours ago. This article.. mouse over the "7 hours ago" in UTC: 2026-11-09T18:56:29

    • dang 13 hours ago

      Just to add to gnabgib's (correct) explanation:

      It's an artifact of HN's re-upping system, described at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308 and links back from there. About the timestamps, there are past explanations here: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que....

      Sorry for the confusion—I know it's weird but the alternative turns out to be even more confusing and we've never figured out how to square that circle!

      The relativized timestamps only appear on the frontpage and /item pages, so you can always go to links like https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=lairv or https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=anthropic.com to see the absolute order.